Sunday, August 29, 2010

Match-fixing allegation: reaction from Pakistan

As soon as the news of Pakistani players being investigated for match-fixing (affectionately called spot-fixing these days) hit the press, it evoked wide-spread protests across Pakistan. Effigies of BCCI president and Lalit Modi were burnt and demands for severing all ties with India were expressed. The parliamentarians demanded an unconditional apology from India. Pakistan's sports minister released a press statement: "We blame India, BCCI, IPL and the Modi brothers for this controversy (when pointed out that Narendra Modi and Lalit Modi are not related; he just laughed and said "well, you never know"). All this has happened because India, under RAW's instructions, refused to sign any of our players for the last IPL season. If our players had participated in the IPL, they would have never felt the need to go after this petty cash. And even if they wanted to, I'm sure the IPL stint would have left them either too injured to play or too useless to make them attractive to the bookies. So India should first apologize to us and then send all the IPL owners to our country to sign our players. This time we expect our players to be signed for the maximum amount possible and, in addition, the 10% commission that our President takes from all transactions should also be borne by IPL".
A disgusted Mohammad Yousuf immediately announced his retirement from international cricket “I’m highly disappointed by the treatment given to me by everybody. I’m Pakistan’s best batsman for last ten years and have devoted my entire life to my country, or at least parts of it that I couldn’t sell to ICL. And yet, these bookies have completely ignored me and giving more importance to the new comers like Amir and Asif. I’m also completely capable of underperforming by taking money from them; such as getting out for ducks and running out my partners. PCB also has been extremely unfair to me. They have selected a bunch of useless batsmen who get out on their own by edging the ball to the slips; that doesn’t give me any opportunity to run them out. If PCB had selected at least one other international quality batsman, say someone like Younis, then both of us could have taken money from the bookies to run each other out. I’ve consulted my elders and decided that this time I’m definitely, most certainly and without an iota of doubt, going to retire from international cricket”. When asked if there is any chance of him reconsidering his decision, he added “well, if the bookies ask me nicely…”. On a related note, Afridi is considering making a come back to test cricket saying that "till now, I had underestimated test cricket's true potential"

Inzamam ul Haq criticized the current captain Salman Butt for not forfeiting the match immediately "Refusing to play and forfeiting the match is the best way to deal with such allegations. That's how you get all the sympathy and shift the blame. Now, I'm afraid, it's too late to stop an unbiased investigation into the matter. Salman just showed his immaturity by not acting promptly. What else can you expect  from someone who is named 'butt'? ".


Pakistan’s coach Waqar Younis looked mildly surprised when asked for his reaction. In a mix of Punjabi, Middlesex and Ethiopian accent he said “I don’t know what this fuss is all about. Since I’ve become the coach of Pakistan team, our primary goal has been to build team unity. And if this incident doesn’t convince you that we are the most united team in the world, then I don’t know what will. See, for the entire summer our batsmen were taking the flack from the media and fans for their poor performance and bowlers were basking in the glory. So now to take the pressure off the batsmen, our bowlers have decided to get involved in match fixing, so that the media attention shifts to them. If the heat on them becomes too much I’m planning to start a fight with my coaching staff in the full view of the public during a practice session or we may even ask Asif to start taking drugs again. It’s all a matter of playing for each other.”
An angry Ramiz Raja wrote a strongly worded article on cricinfo (which was run through an adjective-remover program before getting published) “Match fixing is not the heinous crime it is being made out to be. How do you expect that the Pakistani players, who have grown up watching players like Akram and Salim Malik, resist the temptation of getting involved with the bookies? Calling it an offence is highly regrettable. It’s high time match fixing is legalized.”
Shohaib Akhtar, seeing the words Pakistan and “spot-fixing” together decided to sue PCB; but when pointed out that “spot-fixing” doesn’t refer to his treatment for the genital warts, he calmed down.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Why Harbhajan is out of Mumbai Indians in IPL4

Assuming there will be a IPL-4, Harbhajan should start looking for a new employer.  I mean, the stupidity of this guy never fails to amaze me. Lets do a quick recap

He was dropped immediately after his debut series for "questionable on field behavior". (I always wondered what "questionable behavior" can someone have on field. The only probable explanation now seems to have been refuted with the announcement that he is marrying a girl)

Then he was thrown out of the national cricket academy on disciplinary ground. (Well, now come to think of it, may be my first guess was right. We'll watch how that wedding goes)

Then he had an altercation with police who didn't allow a male photographer friend to his hotel (Hmm.. ok I'll stop trying to force fit these into my conclusion)

Then he was reported for illegal action.. and thankfully this time they were talking about his bowling action (finally.. a cricket related controversy)

He publicly criticized the coach for dropping Dada.

He walked on the ramp.. that's not a problem at all. But look at his stupidity.. If you have hair like that, will you ever remove your turban? Hell, I'll even convert to Sikhism to hide such hair.. Gosh.. 

If you are still here, I promise.. no more such pictures of Bhajji without his turban..

He called Symonds a monkey.. which was not so bad, if you come to think of it. I've been called worse names than that.. sometimes even by my own family.. and I've called people by worse names.. but whenever I call someone such names, I ensure few things 1) They should be no more than 8 years old 2) should be smaller in size 3)should be with their parents.. This is my survival tactics.. If I have to call someone who is twice my size and has a history of drinking problems, I stick to "Sir".. look at this picture and just imagine how close we came to having Amit Mishra as our leading spinner in Tests.



With all that, just when you though Bhajji was a complete idiot, he gave us hope.. He slapped Sreesanth.. and one began to think "hey, this guy is not so bad after all.. I always knew he had some hidden qualities".. Bhajji became our hero.. Even his full tosses looked like deadly doosras and his yorkers looked like well flighted off breaks.. all was well with our world..

And that's when this happened... I can't even imagine how stupid one can be to make this mistake..  how can he break the most basic rule.. every child, growing up, has learned this at his mother's knees.. every religious book teaches you this.. this is the first lesson you learn when you enter school.. that is.. you never never mess with your boss's wife


The worse part is Nita Ambani seems to be enjoying this. Don't be surprised if Bhajji is calling Subhash Chandra for an ICL contract.

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

After IPL is nationalized

There is a humorous trend going on in twitter - #AfterIPLisNationalized

I joined the band wagon and tweeted like crazy. Here are ten of my selected tweets on this subject (You can view all my tweets here)
  1. Pakistan will ask their players to infiltrate the border to play in the league 
  2. % of IPL revenues will be used for building new cricket stadiums in Afghanistan
  3. Pakistan will ask donation from US to set up PPL. Much to US's anger they will allow Taliban to field one team.
  4. Fielding positions will be defined in hindi. Teesra Aadmi (third man), Acchi Tang (fine leg), Khisko (slip) etc 
  5. Arundhati Roy will start a "pitch bachao" andolan.. No heavy rollers will be allowed on the pitch
  6. Jharkhand team will have Dhoni, Saurabh Tiwari and 9 Dhoni look alike Maoists.. carefully selected by Shibu Soren
  7. For matches between B'lore and Chennai, SC will allot the number of drinks each team can have during drinks break
  8. Mandira Bedi will play for KXI once the women's bill passes in the parliment
  9. Mumbai Indians will be called Mumbai Manus.. team will have only Marathis. Atul Bedade will be the batting coach
  10. There will be a new team.. UP's Bhayas.. On field it'll have 9 fielders and 2 Mayawati's statues.. 

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Is Warne throwing in the towel ?

I saw these tweets by Shane Warne yesterday night..
"Apologies to all royals fans, very shattering to play like that tonight in such a big game ! Out of ipl ... Such a shame, our young players"
"Sorry meant to be our young inexpeirienxed players have learnt a lot, we are all hurting , sad feeling to be knocked out, goodnight all"

One can understand how dejected and disappointed Warne must be feeling after being knocked out of the tournament.. But there is one small problem.. they are still not knocked out.. at least not mathematically. At the time of writing this article, here are the team standings
Team          Points         Matches Left
--------        --------        ----------------
Mumbai        18                    2
RCB              14                   1
CSK              12                   2
DD                12                   2
RR                 12                  1
Deccan          12                   2
KKR              10                   2
KXI               8                     2


So given that there are 7 more matches to go, only team that has been theoretically knocked out are Punjab. Even KKR, who are two points below RR in the table have a chance.


RR has two problems, they have just 1 match left and their net run rate is pretty poor compared to other teams in contention. It goes without saying that the next match is a must win for them, which will take them to 14th position. RR should also hope that Mumbai and Punjab win their remaining matches, which would make the job difficult for other teams. Although RR can still win by a big margin and improve their net run rate, there is even one possibility that net run rate won't come into picture. Here is how - 

Teams Winner
CSK DD DD
KXI Deccan KXI
RCB Mumbai Mumbai
KKR RR RR
KXI CSK KXI
DD Deccan DD
KKR Mumbai Mumbai


And the points table at the end of it would look something like -

Team           Points
Mumbai 22
DD 16
RCB 14
RR 14
CSK 12
Deccan 12
KXI 12
KKR 10


So RR is definitely not out of it by any means. Admittedly, their job is difficult and not completely in their hands. But one wonders why Warne is throwing in the towel with one more match to go. 

On a related note, did anyone notice Warne signaling for a strategic time out against Mumbai from the dug out? One small problem - it was sixth over of RR innings and that time-out belonged to bowling team (Mumbai). One wonders if captaincy is taking its toll on Warney now.

Monday, April 12, 2010

If I were Rohit Sharma..

Once upon a time there was an Indian cricketer called Devang Gandhi. Don't worry if that name doesn't strike a chord in your brain, because it means you are normal and, in any case, brains don't have chords. However, if you are one of the 9 people who still remember him and you are not his family, then I'll strongly recommend donating your brain for research (I'm contemplating on doing the same).

Devang Gandhi made his test debut for India in 1999; scored 75 in his second innings, and was the top scorer for the team in his next innings, with a score of 88.
This is when his life took a really interesting and unexpected turn ..... Ian Chappell made a prediction about him. Chappell predicted that India had finally solved their opening problems (remember that those days Sidhu was considered the best Indian opener since Gavaskar; and Sehwag was a name yet unheard of). Chappell, on the account of those two innings from Devang Gandhi, was convinced that he had the makings of a successful opening batsman and could go on to play for India for a long long time. Gandhi scored 6, 4, 0 in his next three innings and looked so out of sorts against Australia that he was dropped from the team. He never played for India again. Last I heard of him, he was also dropped from his domestic team (Bengal), announced his retirement from first class cricket and was busy giving tips to youngsters on how to become a successful test opener.

A similar inflection point came in JP Duminy's career in 2009. Chappell, wrote a long piece, on how Duminy is a great in making. Read that article and count the number of times he compares Duminy to Tendulkar and Ponting. Well, Duminy, till then had a decent test career; 10 innings 389 runs and average close to 50. In the 10 innings of post-Chappell-prediction-era he has scored 129 runs and his career average has dropped below 30 (check this out). His vulnerability against spin is now well documented and his stock has fallen so much that he was ignored for the first half of the IPL this year (admittedly, initially few matches were due to injury), despite top scoring for his team in last year's edition. There are question marks about his continued selection in the SA team now and one wonders if his career is going in the same direction as Devang Gandhi's (On a serious note, I hope not. He is a fantastic player to watch and I hope he rediscovers his form).

This is the reason why I would be really worried, if I were Rohit Sharma. Chappell has been calling Sharma a great player in making since that last one day tournament India played in Australia.  Chappell, during that series, mentioned on air that Rohit Sharma was a strong contender for carrying India's middle order in test cricket and take over the mantle from Tendulkar. One wonders if this is what is preventing Sharma for getting selected in the test team. But Sharma was still scraping by, since Chappell hadn't put that prediction down in writing. All of that changed this week, when Chappell wrote this piece.

He says:
"And here was Rohit, a young Indian batsman of abundant skill, displaying the complementary nerve that is required to succeed at the highest level. The question is not whether Rohit has the skill to make it as a batsman in all forms of the game but whether the selectors will ignore his talents for so long that his best years will be past when he's finally chosen."

So, what "best years' Chappell is talking about? Sharma has player 42 ODIs for India with an average of 25; an average that's closer to Agarkar's than Tendulkar's; and a strike rate of 72; more Dravidian than Dhoni-esque. The question we need to ask is why he is still part of India's ODI team and why he is picked for India's T20 world-cup squad, over Virat Kohli (but, then we are forgetting that it is Srikanth who selects the team these days). In any case, Rohit Sharma shouldn't worry too much about his position in the current team. What he should be really concerned about is, now what happens to his career, now that Chappell had made the prediction and, this time, in writing. Out of all the things that can damage a batsman's career, Chappell's prediction is the worst; way ahead of a Shohaib Akhtar's beamer, Darrel Harper's finger or even the cheerleaders.

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Meet the future captain of Pakistan cricket team...

You heard it here first. Note down the date, time and place, because today I'm going to make a bold prediction,  a prediction about who will be the captain of Pakistan cricket team in two years (which means predicting the 17th captain after the current one, not an easy task by any means).

And the player is Nasir Jamshed, a left handed batsmen who player 12 ODIs for Pakistan in the past, scored 349 runs at an average of 35 and strike rate of 101. Not earth shattering stuff, you are saying? And some of you would probably have noticed from his cricinfo page that he is already 20 years old, almost 11 years older than the current captain Shahid Afridi, who himself has been playing cricket for 14 years now. So neither stats nor age is in favor of our guy. Then why do I think he is a candidate? Hear me out and it'll all make sense.

Over the years, selectors of national teams have used different criteria to select the squad and the captain. Do you go with the naturally gifted players or do you go with the ones in their peak form? How do you balance between raw talent and work ethics? Do you look for a consistent player or the ones who can change the games on their own? These are probably some of the questions national selectors contemplate (unless, of course, they are Srikanth)

Hence, I was pleasantly surprised when the newly appointed chief selector of Pakistan, Mohsin Khan, showed great clarity of thought and articulated the criteria of selection. “My criteria of selecting players are discipline, fitness and performance and I will not compromise on any of it.", said Mohsin Khan. Then, he promptly went ahead and appointed Shahid Afridi as the captain of the national team. Makes sense, doesn't it?. If discipline is one of your key criteria for selecting the team, then who else is more suitable to lead the team than Afridi. The guy has recently been banned by ICC for tampering with the ball and have been fined by his board. He has threatened to quit his domestic team when he was overlooked for captaincy. He also has an extremely rich history of excellent disciplined behavior; be it mid-pitch collisions, tampering with the pitch (video), threatening spectators with the bat, just to name a few examples. One can understand what Mohsin Khan meant when he said that he will not compromise on discipline. He clearly means business.

So now, once we know that how serious the chief selector is, can we look at the domestic circuit to see who else fits the bill. Of course, one need to be cognizant of the fact that the talent displayed in domestic circles doesn't always gets translated to international arena. But all we need to look for is the early signs, signs that show a next Tendulkar in the making or in this case the next Afridi.

That's why, I almost jumped out, shouting Eureka, when I read this article in Dawn (for those who are wondering - no, I was not in my bath tub at that time and I was completely dressed). Nasir Jamshed has been fined for cheating in the school exam. Wow! the signs of another Afridi in making is unmistakable. Not only did he cheat, but he was also caught "red handed". If this doesn't convince you that he has all the right stuff to be Pakistan's captain, I don't know what will. I'll be watching this guy's career with considerable interest.

And by the way, I believe Ramiz Raja, after hearing about this incident, is planning to write an artcle called "Give Nasir a break" and "legalize" cheating in exams (a sequel to his earlier article about ball tampering). His logic would be something along the lines of - the entire exam system is unfairly biased towards hardworking and intelligent students. So to offer a even playing field to guys like Nasir, we should allow people to cheat in exams. We are in for interesting times.

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Imports...

Just imported posts from some of my older blogs.. Hence the big time gaps between the posts..

Friday, March 26, 2010

The curious case of the back-up spinner

Consider the bowling figures of these 4 spinners in IPL:
                     Matches    Overs      Runs     Wickets    Avg         Eco. Rate
Exhibit-1        6              22           161         7             23.00           7.31
Exhibit-2        4              16           114         4             28.50           7.12
Exhibit-3        5              19           106         4             26.50           5.57
Exhibit-4        5              18           133         3             44.33           7.38

If you are in charge of selecting the national squad and have been asked to pick one out of these four bowlers, who would you pick? Exhibit-3 has an exceptional economy rate for a spinner in T20 cricket, he is the most experienced of the lot, but hasn't represented his national team for a while now. Exhibit-1, on the other hand, clearly leads the way with wickets and average, has been playing in the national team and has also dismissed the leading run scorers of IPL by some wonderful traditional spin bowling. Exhibit-2 has been steady and has recently played for the national team. The one who is not doing so well, in the above figures, is Exhibit-4 and he also hasn't played for the national team for a while. Now, let's also clarify that there is nothing much to choose between these four when it comes to batting.

So, who would you pick now? The best bet looks Exhibit-1. If you want to take a bit of risk and purely go by form, then you might go for Exhibit-3. Or if you want to play a bit safe and go for the steadier option, then pick Exhibit 2. Can you think of any logic based on which anyone would pick Exhibit-4 above other three?
Well, unfortunately, our selectors don't seem to base their judgment on any sort of logic that a rational human being would apply (which probably shouldn't come as a big surprise, given that the chairman of selectors is K. Srikanth).

If you haven't guessed already, here are the four players in question.
Exhibit-1: Amit Mishra
Exhibit-2: P. Ojha
Exhibit-3: M. Kartik
Exhibit-4: Piyush Chawla

Why Chawla was selected in the T20 world cup squad will remain a mystery to me. Given that India hasn't played a lot of T20 internationals off late, it was probably a good idea to base the selection mostly on the IPL performances. Or the selectors could have looked at the performance in ODIs. But none of this explain why Chawla was picked. The selectors probably know something that rest of us don't. Chawla must have some hidden talent (which, one must say, he has done well to hide so far from the world).
The best part of this entire issue is that we'll never know whether the selectors are right about Chawla. Given that Jadeja would be picked in the team as the back-up spinner and we have Pathan/ Yuvraj to roll their arms overs, Chawla may never get a game.

Sunday, February 21, 2010

The aftermath of the "IPL snub"...

The "IPL snub", as Pakistan likes to call it, has come back to haunt India again. I mean, what were those private franchisees thinking, not spending thousands of dollars on players who may never show up. How can they refuse to just give away money to Pakistanis?  They never thought their actions would have such serious repercussions. How naive one can be? A nation, whose entire economy is based on receiving charity from others, was deeply hurt.

The first big causality was, wait for it, kabbadi; when Pakistan's kabbadi team refused to tour India. You would think that should have taught us a lesson. That decision by Pakistan alone should have convinced all those IPL bosses to apologize to them. But, Pakistan had moved on. One of their ministers, I forgot which one, while speaking to a news channel said that the time of saying sorry was over. India should send a delegation, personally apologize to the cricketers and take them to play in IPL. I thought that was a very fair ask. I mean, sure, the two countries may not be willing to send delegations to share information on terrorism, help in investigation; but when it comes to such important matters as IPL, how can you not send your best and brightest representatives to sort out the issue.

And now, just when India was about to recover from the "kabbadi snub", comes the killer blow. Pakistan's national cycling federation has decided not to invite Indians to the biggest athletic event on the planet; an event, which completely overshadows the Olympics or the soccer world cup in terms of the fan following; an event, which every Indian child, growing up, one day wants to be a part of; an event known as Tour de Pakistan. The secretary of the federation showed tremendous clarity of thought and rational decision making when he said "As a protest for the IPL auction we have decided not to invite Indian cyclists for our event,"  

To understand what our countrymen are missing, you have to picture a 12 day journey that goes from Peshawar to Karachi; a journey that takes you through a great land full of suicide bombers and terrorist training camps. Indian cyclists miss the once in a life time opportunity of getting up close and personal with the Taliban leaders, the Al-Qaeda members and who knows, if they were lucky, they might even have been at the receiving end of a drone attack. Name another sports event in the world that provides so much adventure and learning experience. 

The critics might point out that the Sri Lankan cricket team got attacked while touring Pakistan. But they only stayed in the high security hotels and traveled, escorted, only between their hotel and the ground. How can one even compare that to the safe environment of the Tour de Pakistan, where the participants have to pass through the mountains and forests of the Pakistan on their cycles. And particularly if the participants are from India, a country against which Pakistani terrorists have never even raised a finger.

I guess this "cycling snub" has demonstrated what the scientists called "the butterfly effect". I'm sure Lalit Modi and the IPL owners never saw this coming. They all should be held responsible for the disastrous effect it would have on our nation. Let this be a lesson for all of us. If you are a corporate, forget making profit for your partners and shareholders, forget the sentiments of your customers; if you have money, give it to Pakistan. Else who knows, may be the great game of kho kho is next in the  list of causalities.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

IPL is India's most innovative company

Fastcompany.com just released its list of most innovative companies across the globe and across multiple industries; and surprise, surprise IPL is at number 22. It's the no # 1 Indian company in the list and it's the 2nd among all the sports companies. I am not aware of the criteria used in coming up with the list and I'm sure most of the readers would disagree with some of the rankings (For example, what exactly did Facebook do in the last one year to jump from 15th position to 1st?). But the point to note is that from India IPL made it to the top-50, not the infosys-es or the TCS-es ("process innovation", anyone?). IPL finds itself in the company of Googles and Apples of the world and they beat Microsoft and twitter by some margin (ok, "Microsoft" and "innovation" are two words that are generally not uttered together, but still they are on the list). Let's appreciate them for what they have achieved so far.

More on this later..

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Under-pressure Bangladeshis and the unlucky Pakistanis

Bangladesh is once again staring at one of their customary test defeats and for some reason, which is not clear to me, their coach, Jamie Siddons, is angry. Siddons says "I'm not sure what went wrong, whether the boys felt the pressure of the big occasion or if they thought they could go out and actually get the runs, but it was certainly not in the plan". What big occasion? Is Bangladesh taking on New Zealand in a test that would ultimately decide the world no #1? No, wait, that's the other match that just ended. Or may be Siddon's is referring to the fact that Bangladesh is batting in the 4th innings of the match. Generally, matches involving Bangladesh don't enter the 4th innings, so this must be an overwhelming experience for them. Only if their No # 7 and #8 hadn't spoiled the first innings, they all would have been relaxing in their rooms by now. And yeah Siddons, the real problem is that your batsmen thought they can get these runs, since they have been chasing the 400 plus scores in test matches so frequently.

Now on the other side, 44% of the Pakistanis taking part in a survey blamed their team's defeat in Australia to poor cricket.  Let me say that again, only 44% of the Pakistanis believe that poor cricket is the reason why they lost all 9 matches to Australia in that tour; 3-0 in tests (two with margins of 170 and 231 runs each), 5-0 in ODIs (again twice with 100+ margins) and 1-0 in twenty twenty. 13% thought the team was unlucky (only if the cameras hadn't caught Afridi biting the ball, or only if Kamran had hurt is ankle during practice) and 20% of the respondents were not sure why the team lost.

However, for me, the most surprising aspect of the survey results was that, in a show of tremendous maturity, not even one of them blamed BCCI, IPL, Lalti Modi or Narendra Modi for their team's defeat. Or may be the surveyor, in a surprisingly foolish oversight, forgot to provide these options, which would also explain why 20% were unsure.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

If the Internet collapses....

How Stuff Works, a website that I haven't visited for more than nine years now, has an interesting article  about what would happen to our lives if the internet collapsed. It's not clear to me at what point exactly during the last nine years, they went from their core positioning of explaining how things work to speculating about the implications of if they don't.

Now there is nothing wrong in changing one's core positioning or belief. I mean there are bigger guys than How Stuff Works (henceforth called HSW) who claimed their philosophy was to do one thing really really well, but ended up rolling out hundreds of half-baked products. Now don't even get me started on the "Doing No Evil.. " thing, but then I digress.

Coming back to HSW's article, these guys make an honest attempt, but fail way short in understanding the catastrophic effect of such an event. They waste way too much time worrying about trivial matters such as loss of jobs, impact on the economy, political crisis etc that they completely ignore some more fundamental issues. So how serious impact exactly would the collapsed internet have on your life? The short answer is "very", much more that HSW wants you to believe. Let's address some of them -

Imagine the day you wake up and realize that people can actually use more than 140 characters when they communicate? No matter what anyone tells you, believe me when I say that we are simply not prepared for such a world. None of us have any idea what that 141st character would be. But something tells me it won't be pretty.

And the worse part is, after few decades, once the world get accustomed to this fact, it will expect you to use more than 140 characters in your conversations too, and no you can't just add hashtags to sound cool.

Imagine a world where if you have to call someone an a**h*** you have to do it in their face and not as some cool, brave anonymous guy in a discussion forum. Imagine how difficult it would be to have arguments with a fellow human being or a group of fellow human beings if you have to actually be there in person to do it and you have to use your real name. You can't postpone buying that health insurance with Accidental Medical Expense (AME) rider any longer.

You can no longer have 500 friends who you have never met and have no intention of meeting, but who are always there to fertilize your farms, to send you illegal transaction record, to share all their greatest achievements; such as removing fish hooks from another friend's tank, and lastly, not to forget, friends who are always more than willing to poke you.

In a world without internet, when you go to office, you have to actually look at some applications on your computer other than the one with the blue "e" icon (or the earth on fire icon). If you didn't pay attention during that induction training 12 years back, you are screwed.

Now, if you are thinking that you can still somehow manage to get by with all these issues, I'm sorry to inform you that I've been saving the worst news for the end. Imagine the worst thing that can ever happen to you. What happens when the thing that you love most, the one thing that has been holding your life together is taken away from you? Still didn't get it? I've one word for you.. PORN

Downloading and watching pornography is what has historically separated human beings from animals. (Not sure if it has changed though in recent past. Someone should do a market sizing exercise for the porn industry among animals. Given the fact that some of the animals, with sheer determination and hard work, have made it to the industry as actors, it's quite likely that they might have developed a fan following among their species. But that topic needs a separate and much lengthier post).

If the internet collapses, suddenly this beautiful world of free porn is taken away from us. What do we do next? Go back to buying magazines? Paint our walls with erotic pictures (an art form which, by the way, was lost when our ancestors moved out of caves)? For married men like me, it's not that easy. Where do we hide the porn? Gone are the days of saving 500 GBs of videos in a folder named "Work > Legal > Important Documents". Yeah, sure you can stuff it under the mattress. But how long before it starts piling up and your wife starts to notice the bulge (on the mattress, of course).

Thankfully, HSW assures us that the internet is a tough cookie and such an eventuality is pretty remote. But I'm not so sure. It wont hurt us to be prepared, will it? So go ahead and buy that 24 month subscription of penthouse magazines as soon as you can. That site won't be there for long.

Sunday, February 14, 2010

Sponsored terrorism links by Times of India

One of the common monetization strategies used by content providers on internet is what is knows as "contextual advertising". The phrase is self-explanatory enough, it refers to a technology where ads are served based on the context of the page (Google's "Adsense for content" is the most popular product to use this technology). It works best when the content of the page is somewhat suggestive of the commercial intent of the user; for example someone reading a review of digital cameras is most likely interested in buying one. But it blows on your face when this contextual ads start appearing against sensitive topics; such as accidents, wars or terrorism.

Now here is a good example of when not to use contextual advertising. Today, I was reading an article about Pune blast in Times of India's website. Just when I was about to leave the page, my eyes went to the ads on the right hand side of the page - First there were ads on Jobs in Pune, Houses in Pune, Brides/ Grooms in Pune. Ok, so now that there is a terrorist attack in Pune, it suddenly becomes very lucrative to buy properties there? And wait, does that make you want to marry a Pune boy/ girl even more?

Now this was not the worse part. As I scrolled down the page, I came across a section called "Sponsored Links" (another term for ads). The sponsored links were - Terrorism, Terrorism and Islam, Counter Terrorism BS, Counterterrorism, FT Hood Terrorism.

Wait, it doesn't end here. If you follow any of the links, you'll see ads on life insurance, "is Jesus really God" (don't ask) and even an ad on how to plan your second wedding if you are divorced or widowed.

Thanks for being so sensitive TOI. This is exactly what we expect from our leading national newspaper. Here are the screen-shots:

From Oval to WACA ....

"I am disgusted with the way the laws have been interpreted. You cannot tell whether the ball was scratched, unless you catch somebody in the process. It's a needless controversy." This was Ramiz Raja's on air comment in Aug, 2006 during the oval test, a match in which Pakistan was accused of ball tampering and as a result they decided to forfeit the game. Now flash forward three years, a Pakistani cricketer was actually caught "in the process", as Ramiz would call it. And this time what's Ramiz's reaction? He sits back and writes a lengthy piece about how we should leave the culprit alone. Some interesting lines from Ramiz's article

".. it is also time to remind ourselves that this madness stems from a certain mindset and a background. Afridi comes from an era, a cricketing culture, where ball-tampering is considered a normal cricket activity, the done thing on flat Pakistani pitches - an art form and not a sin. It's been a part of the Pakistan team's standard operating procedure."


He then goes on to compare the ball tampering practice of Pakistanis to the sledging by Aussies and the "moaning" by England when they tour subcontinent. Wow Ramiz. So Pakistanis are justified in tampering with the ball because English players complain when touring sub-continent? What next ? Pakistani bowlers are justified in chucking, because Indian batsmen are wristy ? Asif is justified in taking drugs because Sreesanth knows how to dance (or at least claims to)?

Ramiz is not done yet.
"Calling ball-tampering unlawful and an offense is regrettable...shouldn't the authorities stop looking at the practice with suspicion and instead look to bring it into the cricket syllabus so that we can all move on?"

That's a good suggestion. Now that a Pakistani is actually caught in the act, we should legalize ball tampering. May be we should also change the doping laws so Asif doesn't have to feign injury before the next big ICC event.

Interestingly, it's suggested that Ramiz's outburst on air is what flamed the Pakistani players to protest and eventually forfeit that game in Oval. Cricinfo had the story. They should have known better to base their action on such a man's word, who at best can be called inconsistent or at worst a hypocrite.